Mount

The mount is what it all is actually about. Shooting the nightsky is rather sooner than later producing trails behind the stars due to the Earths rotation. That rotation has to be 'stopped' and while that is an action with some pretty unwanted consequences it is better, and foremost easier, to just counter that rotation by an exact same rotation into the opposite direction with the effect that your camera get fixed in its space to shoot outer space.
There a different types of mounts which roughly divide their world into two regions: the 'normal' ones and the strain wave types. The latter being stronger, looking way less complicated therefor way smaller and lighter and they are quieter. My knowledge is very limited but I did run into a few quirks that gave me 11 months of trouble without knowing where to look until I just bumped into the cause that made me change the mount...
WarpAstron WD-17
My initial choice was the WarpAstron WD-17 because it produces almost no sound except for a tiny high frequency tone that I am still able to hear while my guess is that most people won't. That way it will not draw any attention from passing people when placed in the front garden. Further it can control periodic errors on both axes and it has two strain wave motors that are very strong and therefore it doesn't need a counter weight up to 13kgs of payload. There is more to this mount but this is the more important part.
The mount comes in a double handled well padded case which is very nice as its own weight is some 4kgs and putting it in just any bag is not really what you want. A photo will follow.
Full manual by Chris Woodhouse.
Official Warp Astron Forum.
Firmware resources.
The manufacturer knows about the issues specifically with polar alignment. I had it connected to the Stellarmate Pro but it behaved very erratic. That behavior lately got absolutely much worse resulting in no contact with the mount. With the handcontroller though everything was fine. So I replaced my Stellarmate Pro as that has its own problems and adding those of the WD17 did it, Iwas done with that combination. So as my other equipment is from ZWO my logic choice was the ZWO ASI Air Plus. Right?
Well... sort of... Handling the WD17 in the ASI Air Plus was better until... I came to polar alignment. My set was aimed at Polaris within 2-3 degrees and once alignment succeeded (after many tries with erratic behaviour again) the alignment got back with a 34 DEC and 29 RAdegree variance🤯 which I never even got from the Stellarmate.
So a search on the internet brought me to Discord where manufacturer WarpAstron has a channel. See for yourself the comments over there. It made me decide to replace the WD-17 with a ZWO AM5 which is due tomorrow.
Regarding those issues... have a look at my page about guidance computers as well!
ZWO AM5n
SarahMath Astro extensive reviewPeter Zelinka including basic ASI Air workflow
Cuiv the lazy geek